I found it somewhat troubling after learning about Indonesian government’s focus on the forestry sector for its 2020 goal of 26% carbon emissions reduction. An article from Reuters indicates that Indonesia is the world’s No. 3 greenhouse gas emitter due to deforestation, peatland degradation and forest fires [article]. The pledge for cutting 26% carbon emissions by Indonesian government is then welcomed by international [article], although some say that it is pretty ambitious. The interesting part is what President SBY said:
“This target is entirely achievable because most of our emissions come from forest-related issues, such as forest fires and deforestation,”
Continue reading Is it right for Indonesia to focus on forestry for its 26% carbon emissions reduction goal?
During my propososal writing, I found this clearinghouse website that explains how transportation has a strong connection with climate change. I know it is a little too late for me finding out the existence of this website considering that I am studying this area. But it is certainly not too late for my proposal and my research.
I bet this website just came out recently during Obama’s administration. Check this out: Transportation and Climate Change Clearinghouse
An article in Kompas reports how Indonesian government plans to achieve the 26% carbon emission reduction by 2020. The article also further notes about potential 41% reduction assuming the presence of international supports.
These are pretty ambitious goals. But there is nothing wrong with these goals because we need to have that kind of goals in order for us to move forward; in order for us to make a big change for our next generations.
The simple yet critical challenge that has been the challenge in every case, how are we translating that goals into actions, that can actually bring all of us to the point where the goals of carbon emissions reduction is indeed achieved.
Continue reading 26% carbon emission reduction by 2020